User talk:CartoonistHenning

From Uncyclomedia, the UnMeta-wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

CartoonistHenning seal.png



Contents

Do you want to adopt a wiki? Please read the manual first.

[edit] et:

I just ran across some junk pages. Would you delete the following, please?:

Thank you. Llwy ar lawrlogimalpedie:en:be:ga:la:ru:sco: 15:26, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Done | Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 13:23, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Spam on Necyclopaedia

Please see la:Categoria:Spam. I have replaced all spam I came across with a template that puts it in that category. Would you please delete all those pages? Thank you. Llwy ar lawrlogimalpedie:en:be:ga:la:ru:sco: 15:47, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Done | Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 12:46, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

[edit] grc:

The 'coupon spammers', as I call them, have attacked it. Please delete the following:

I would also suggest protecting 'C*up*n' against creation, either partially or fully. I have done this on be: and I think it has saved me some trouble.

I have globally blocked several IPs that belong to the website in back of this spam (optimum.net) and that should slow things down but there is still cleanup to do and there may well be as yet unblocked IPs that belong to this company.

As always, I am willing to help you with the cleanup work if you think you need it.

There is a similarly spammy situation on simple:. Rhubella Marie has deleted a lot of the spam and blocked its creators but she hasn't yet got all of it and it's still being created. I would be happy to help with the spammers on Simple Uncyc; I've actually made a request to do so at Requests for permissions and I'd like someone to review it. If you don't want to give me rights over there I'd suggest someone at least checkuser the spammers - some of them probably share IPs.

To delete all the spam at simple:, you need only delete everything in simple:Category:Proposed deletion. I am putting all the spam I can find in there. Llwy ar lawrlogimalpedie:en:be:ga:la:ru:sco: 17:44, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Cleaned up grc: and protected the page you mentioned. I gave you the administrator permission on simple:. There used to be a small community over there and I was a bit reluctant to do that without an "offical" nomination. I think my decision to op you anyway is the best solution for the wiki | Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 12:56, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
From what I know of the users were Illogicopedia. Rhubella beach.jpgRhubella Marie, the rat sockpreppie 2085 preppieditsRhubella.jpg 19:34, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Just found grc:User:Charley66 today. Please delete it. Thank you. Llwy ar lawrlogimalpedie:en:be:ga:la:ru:sco: 19:48, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Galicia flag feito.png Feito! Rhubella beach.jpgRhubella Marie, the rat sockpreppie 2085 preppieditsRhubella.jpg 21:46, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

[edit] ro:

Turned up a spam page: ro:Discuție Utilizator:SachinPundir‎. Would you delete it, please? Also thank you for making me able to do cleanup on simple:. It's proving useful. Llwy ar lawrlogimalpedie:en:be:ga:la:ru:sco: 22:37, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Request

Hi. I have been reporting spam on this wiki for a while. However, despite some users are interested on solving the problem, no action taken so far have been enough even to reduce it.
For that reason, I am offering help to try a different approach; just like it is done on other wikis. I would like to help checkusering and blocking spambots accounts and ranges in order to at least reduce spam level here.
I have been doing it on simple.uncyclopedia for a while, that had more than like 50 spambot creations in a day, what have now been reduced a lot. I also use these tools in other wikis, which I'm not sure if mentioning it makes any difference though. I think we could try this and see what happens... if it doesn't work, we move on, but for me it is annoying to see all those spam accounts here. Thanks for your consideration.—Teles «Talk to me˱@ C˲» 15:50, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Is it a global measure you want us to implement and/or do you mean the enhanced recaptcha feature simple: should have? You don't need permission from me for that. If you want me to send a request to [email protected], I can do that for you. It's only his response time that matters then.. Personally, I greenlight the implementation of this feature, which helped nl: alot, on all Uncyclomedia wikis, but it should still be a community's decision. It won't pass, if a community fears a strong decrease in new non-robotic accounts. Given that we are - as a matter of fact - an overall bunch of inactive, small wikis, except for a few number, that will not be a difficult task. If you are willing to help with some additional op buttons, you are always free to list the wikis here | Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 00:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for answering. I am not refering to CAPCTHA, nor about any global measure. I am just offering help with checkuser tools if allowed by community rules and procedures. I would identify spambots per name pattern, check them and in case the information matches with a spam account I would block them and block the ranges if it is being used by more spammers. That would be done here on Unmeta; not on any other wiki.—Teles «Talk to me˱@ C˲» 14:18, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
There is a backlog of IP and ranges unblocked, so Recent changes may become a little flooded for some time. I expect that blocks will reduce in quantity in a few days.—Teles «Talk to me˱@ C˲» 17:11, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
That's okay. I appreciate your help | Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 11:38, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
You may want to edit "MediaWiki:Recentchangestext" to give a brief explanation about it and say that this flooding tends to get less significant with time. What you think?
I am still blocking accounts created in July and that is why there are so many accounts.—Teles «Talk to me˱@ C˲» 01:14, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

[edit] grc: (again)

It's still getting lots of spam, and I'd hate to keep bothering you with requests to take care of it, so if you have time would you please make me able to clean it up? Llwy ar lawrlogimalpedie:en:be:ga:la:ru:sco: 21:54, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Also, there are two pages on tlh: that should be deleted: tlh:Free Lawyer‎ and tlh:User:SonjaVcqrset. Llwy ar lawrlogimalpedie:en:be:ga:la:ru:sco: 21:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

[edit] User merge for Newman6

Can you merge Newman6 with my username? It will help, because I almost forgot that I created Newman6 in 2012. Could you please merge Newman6 with this username please? I am also known as Newman66 on the other Uncyclopedia websites. Newman2 (talk) 17:52, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

That should be done. "Newman" (without the number) is available as well. If you want to get rid of that 2, you can always ask me to rename your account anytime | Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 18:45, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

[edit] admin on sr wiki

User:Loccotario speaks Serbian and wants to help as admin there. Kind regards. --109.106.249.31 19:35, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I don't think that's a good idea. See this vandalism... Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 20:01, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
OK, then, try this one. Thanks. --109.106.244.101 07:39, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
You didn't spit out the answer! :) So, are you giving OK for giving mop to Volunteer ? --212.178.245.107 02:52, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Sorry ;-)
I've e-mailed you. Drop me a message when you don't get response on the Croatian project :-) Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 00:44, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Request for adminship in Bengali Uncyclopedia

Hey, I am user:Commander X on Bengali Uncyclopedia & I am a native speaker of this language. Recently I started to improve the project. Currently there is no active admin. I would love to help thr project & be an admin there. Thanks. 58.97.216.150 09:35, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Requests for permissions

Hi, if you have time there's a section right above this and some stuff on Requests for permissions that you might want to check out. There's also a bit of a mess here; I'd like to be able to clean it up, and of course the one making the mess doesn't want me to but you should probably disregard her comments. Llwy ar lawrlogimalpedie:en:be:ga:la:ru:sco: 04:06, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Llwy had the audacity to remove comments from your talkpage on the Latin Uncyc (including her own comment), thereby showing that her drama is not limited to Wikia sites. If she can't respect comments written on a Sysop's talkpage (which you'll read anyway), she surely cannot be trusted there with special rights let alone on any OTHER project. Do enjoy your Christmas "'God Jul"', (if you celebrate it). Thanks.

Kate (talk) 14:16, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Why did you revert my removal of this? It's not constructive. I've already covered the wikia stuff on the forum. It seems clear that she only wrote this because she doesn't like me. Why then? And would you take a look at what I said on the forum too? Llwy ar lawrlogimalpedie:en:be:ga:la:ru:sco: 18:25, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

It's a lot of text. I'm not finished reading yet. On top of this, there is a task I should upload at midnight. Must sound like a Wikia staff member now, but sorry for my miscommunication in all this. Dispite of the WP rules/guidelines you are referring to - as they actually don't weigh a lot here - everyone has the right to post a comment on my talk page. I have had some issues with a notable Uncyc user, who wanted to have justice for her actions with WP rules, while she admitted she wasn't quite in favour of implementing rules on this wiki herself. It is my responsability to remove or answer messages directed to myself on my userpage. Or you might consider to manage my inbox as well? ;-) I dealt with the Latin Uncapædia yesterday night, I'm probably going to answer you in full tomorrow. Happy year's end | Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 19:23, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
@Kate: Llwy does good work on our wikis. I went through the comments on Dæmonica and there was no constructive answer of yours. You also ignored some important advice. Come with some valid argumentation. Inserting slander like she surely cannot be trusted there... won't help you. Looking forward to having a decent discussion without direct accusations. Thank you | Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 19:23, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. Sorry. You are right. I do get rather long winded and I understand if you haven't read it all yet. Llwy ar lawrlogimalpedie:en:be:ga:la:ru:sco: 00:36, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Captcha

Dear Cartoonist, Why do we haven't an Captcha anymore when you create a new page? ~~BurgerHalloJan~~ 10:55, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm not aware if this has been put on non-active for this wiki, but normally Captcha for new articles is only configured for new users. It probably means you're not anymore considered as a new user by the system. So... congratulations? Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 16:43, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. ~~BurgerHalloJan~~ 17:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Daemonica

I originally supported closing it, but it does seem to have the beginnings of a concept/purpose and I've got some ideas on my user page there about how to develop it. I've also been bold and made some edits there. If you think these are good ideas, is there any chance I could adopt the wiki? Llwy ar lawrlogimalpedie:en:be:ga:la:ru:sco: 06:40, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Could you look at this please? Sorry to bother you. Llwy ar lawrlogimalpedie:en:be:ga:la:ru:sco: 04:45, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
I didn't ignore you, but I've been quite busy to have myself updated about the forum last days. I will look at it immediately. If you'd like to have immediate response you can remind me through e-mail (search on cartoonisthenning at hotmail) | Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 22:49, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Main page of ms:.

It's good to see you again. I'm What here area team.

Could you undo the present revision of this page? It is protected.--What here area team (talk) 17:07, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you.--What here area team (talk) 17:51, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

[edit] About: Pinxin

Your comment: No need to ban this user for indefinite time. Unblocked after personal chat: agreement on having constructive and polite debates.

I will not discuss it unlocked, however I was just having a conversation with him about this issue when the block removed. :/ Rhubella beach.jpgRhubella Marie, the rat sockpreppie 2085 preppieditsRhubella.jpg 01:31, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Okay, sorry, I didn't know that. Next time you block people, I will ask you before I do it myself. I really appreciate that you have private discussions | Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 01:36, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Zeelandic

A week ago the Zeelandic project reached a hundred pages (there are now 102), When i started the project you said that i needed 100 pages to really start the uncyc. I hope you will react soon. ~~BurgerHalloJan~~ 17:32, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

I will send a message to Carlb, so he can implement the zea wiki. Please note that this can take some time | Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 00:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Ok, Thanx.~~BurgerHalloJan~~ 05:14, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

[edit] My resolution on the situation in Questions about the administration of Cthulhu

I came to inform you that the information Renan Jackson is justified on the behavior of Cthulhu administrator in Wikinet policies hurt the site refer to the use of images used there.

Only upload illegal is prohibited, ie, images that violate the laws of Brazil and Canada pictures. Shocking porn pictures is fine, but do not overdo it. in Wikinet:Políticas#Imagens

In Wikinet:Politica de imagens say:

Only upload illegal is prohibited, ie, images that violate the laws of Brazil and Canada pictures. Shocking porn pictures are okay, but remember: You are responsible for what you charge. Images which violate copyrights are OK because Wikinet is on the server that Uncyclomedia Foundation is a nonprofit, fair use asshole.

At first, I do not see any violation of the policy images but I see it as an excuse for a series of administrative abuses user such as:

  1. Abuse upload pornographic images because it is the only active user of the site.
  2. Undo edits that Renan had purpose to alleviate or remove that type of content, with an aggravating user being underage.
  3. Not only disrespect as well as a clear sign of forced into misuse of administrative tools lock. Enforcing its position sysop to reinforce your point of view. And worse, justify the fact that Renan Jackson is a minor to install a policy to block any user who is this condition affecting the freedom of the website.

The only point on which I can defend Cthulhu lies the little frequency of users making him be the sole active user but I can not agree with the situation that is the site because it has brought conflicts to users Uncyclomedia and if nothing is done it tended to repeat infinitely. I believe that the withdrawal of the tools and the subsequent elimination of all pornographic content can eliminate the problem.

In this sense I am leaving my position of neutrality as the administrator of Uncyclomedia, presented by treatments.

Att, Rhubella beach.jpgRhubella Marie, the rat sockpreppie 2085 preppieditsRhubella.jpg 01:53, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

It is not legal to upload pornographic material without references anyway. It could be any kind of porn we don't know of. Any user who violates that rule should reconsider his activity on the given wiki. Brazilian laws do not - I repeat - they do not apply on any Uncyclomedian wiki. Renan can contribute to any kind of Uncyclomedian wiki, even when Brazil forbids him to do this. Of course this doesn't mean that Renan is more equal than other users on the wikis. If the majority of a local wiki votes in favour of a prohibition of all pornographic content, this will be the choice of the community. Uncyclomedia Foundation respects the choice of a community, unless the rules would severely discriminate a specific group of people or harm Uncyclomedia's general mission (e.g. not being an open wiki...). In all circumstances, use of pornographic content should be in function of the project's aim: does it suit a funny context? Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 01:32, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
this is what I spoke, that cthulhu's pornography NO meets a funny context--Gorro papai noel.png Renan Jackson Jingle bells...jingle bells

Happy Holidays Arvore de natal.png 14:39, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Particular email

Henning I'll need to create an email with extension @uncyclopedia.org can explain to me how I do. Rhubella beach.jpgRhubella Marie, the rat sockpreppie 2085 preppieditsRhubella.jpg 12:03, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

I can give you @uncyclomedia.org, the uncyclopedia.org domain is seized by Wikia | Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 11:07, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Oh, right! Rhubella beach.jpgRhubella Marie, the rat sockpreppie 2085 preppieditsRhubella.jpg 02:57, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Stupid pages on tlh:

Please click here and delete the stuff. 173.52.211.59 created these strange pages a few days ago on a lot of wikis, and I wonder if this is grounds for a global block but I may wait and see if it happens again. On the other hand I don't come by most of the uncyclopedias very often, so bad pages sit for a rather long time. Llwy ar lawrlogimalpedie:en:be:ga:la:ru:sco: 05:08, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

The edits were deleted but however the IP vandalized countless projects and request administrative powers in Limburg to block and clear the site. Rhubella beach.jpgRhubella Marie, the rat sockpreppie 2085 preppieditsRhubella.jpg 08:03, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Junk pages on et:

Please click here and here. Alternatively, here (recent changes). 173.52.211.59 seems to be messing up a lot of wikis so I may globally block him. Was going to tell you about tlh: too but Rhubella Marie seems to have taken care of that. Thanks Rhubella. Llwy ar lawrlogimalpedie:en:be:ga:la:ru:sco: 01:58, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

[edit] 71.167.150.176

Actually that's not a spambot (to my knowledge) - that's a vandal who formerly vandalised under the ip 173.52.211.59 who I refer to as the Thomas the Tank Engine vandal. Anyway, there are more edits to revert and pages to delete if you would be so kind. I do wonder why global blocks don't seem to affect this wiki; carlb may have screwed something up. Llwy ar lawrlogimalpedie:en:be:ga:la:ru:sco: 17:45, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Are you sure? These texts seem quite random to me. I believe these are codes or keys for future spambots to indicate or "brand" wikis to be spammed. Perhaps that analysis goes too far, you might be right. It's junk anyway | Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 00:53, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
He might be a spambot, though spambots don't usually know wikicode as advanced as that. He's also posting coherent information that isn't trying to sell a product. Llwy ar lawrlogimalpedie:en:be:ga:la:ru:sco: 19:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Just saying hello

Hello my friend, long time no see! I'm back... and back to help UnMeta... so... what's the point of these many "new users" that I'm seeing in recent changes? It's a problem? Or just nevermind?

About the Neciclopedie's new sysops, so sad they don't continued their work. I don't speak romanian, but I have a affection with Romania as a beauty country with beauty girls. Any advice about how we can popularize the site? Or just sit down and wait someone native discover the site and take care of this wiki?

ABDUL ALHAZRED Salah, Zakāh, Ramadan, Hajj 04:51, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

I have been very busy with college last months, even in my holidays I am drowning in my work. Sorry for that. If you want to have a quick answer from me, I'm still available through my e-mail. Your request about more popularity on that site is shared by many others and by me, but unfortunately I do not know any native speakers. Try to find forums on the Internet or so, but I know that's hard if you do not know the language. I have plans to send an official Uncyclomedia press release about our urge for new users. All the wikis that have less than 100 articles should be. I am also inclined to put a full stop on requests for new languages, unless I see a solid will or engagement of the requestor. I still believe in Uncyclomedia, but we have a very persistent lack of new blood. I'm glad that I'm not the only one who has been concerned about this | Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 23:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Re

Hi CartoonistHenning Thanks for accept mi colaboration in the combat of Spam and Spammers.Greetings!--Leon saudanha (talk) 22:26, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Spam and external links for personal sites and blogs

Hi cartoonist! I have a doubt about Spammers:The inclusion of external links for personal sites and blogs may be considered an form of Spam?I have only seen this type of use of external links for new users today.I look forward to your reply.Greetings!--Leon saudanha (talk) 21:31, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Yes, that is abuse. If the links lead to commercial or possibly fishing websites, you can delete the page | Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 01:14, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Thai Uncyclopedia Issue

Hello Thai Uncyclopedia(th.uncyclopedia.info) have problems about:

  • No confirmation mail was sent when I changed email address.
  • Wiki still show outdate articles.

Please fix , Thank. --Warofdefeat (talk) 13:07, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Belarusian Uncyclopedia

Hello, can you please delete some articles at the Belarusian Uncyclopedia for me? [1], [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] and [7]. Thanks!--84.168.208.136 18:01, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Galicia flag feito.png Feito! Rhubella beach.jpgRhubella Marie, the rat sockpreppie 2085 preppieditsRhubella.jpg 02:59, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Personal tools
View and edit namespaces data

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Reports and requests
Community
Contact
Toolbox